|
|
|
| Analysis of Techniques for Determining Factor Weight in Job Evaluation with Analytic Hierarchy Process |
| ZHU Xiao-mei1, YE Ren-sun2, ZHANG Chong-tian3, WAN Hua1, ZHOU Xue-jun1, LIN Jing-ping1 |
| 1. East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi330013, China; 2. Jiangxi University of Science and Technology, Ganzhou, Jiangxi 341000, China; 3. Ministry of Railways,Beijing 100844, China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Research purposes：AHP is a common quantitative analysis method for determining factors weight in job evaluation and recently, it has been applied widely in job evaluation. However, as AHP is rather complex, its practical effect is not good. Therefore, the analysis and discussion on the techniques for determining factors weight in job evaluation with AHP has important realistic significance to improving the effect of job evaluation.
Research conclusions：(1) The links of design and implement of inquiry paper on the factor weight in job evaluation should be controlled well. First, the inquiry paper should be clear, simple, easily understood and written. Next, the inquired person should be chosen properly. Finally, the inquired person should be trained before writing down the inquiry paper. (2) The scientific and reasonable data analysis method should be used. The arithmetic mean method should be used for weight when collecting data and the determination matrix different from subjective method should be used to enhance the data quality and give full play to AHP.
|
|
Received: 14 April 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
[ 1 ] 樊宏, 戴良铁. 基于层次分析法的岗位评价报酬要素权重确定方法[J]. 价值工程, 2004(7): 55-57.
Fan Hong, Dai Liangtie. The Method of Determining Job Evaluations' Compensable Factors Weight Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Value Engineering, 2004(7): 55-57.
[ 2 ] 李广义. 层次分析法的岗位评价模型设计[J]. 中国流通经济, 2004(2): 40-44.
Li Guangyi. O n the Design of a Position Assessment Model Based on AHP[J]. China Business and Market, 2004(2): 40-44.
[ 3 ] 李宴喜, 陶志. 层次分析法判断矩阵的群组综合构造方法[J]. 沈阳师范学院学报, 2002(2): 86-90.
Li Yanxi, Tao Zhi. Structure Method for Judging Matrix of Group in the AHP Journal of Shenyang Normal University(Natural Science), 2002(2): 86-90.
[ 4 ] 刘新宪, 朱道立. 选择与判断—AHP决策[M]. 上海: 上海科学普及出版社, 1990.
Liu Xinxian, Zhu Daoli. Choice and Judgement-AHP Decision[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Science Popularization Press, 1990.
[ 5 ] 鲁黎明. 图书馆岗位评估模型初探[J]. 图书情报工作, 2005(1): 104-106.
Lu Liming. A Basic Exploration of Library Job-evaluation Models[J]. Library and Information Service, 2005(1): 104-106.
[ 6 ] 骆正清. AHP中不一致判断矩阵调整的新方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2004(6): 84-92.
Luo Zhengqing. A New Method for Adjusting Inconsistency Judgment Matrix in AHP[J]. Systems Engineering-theory & Practice, 2004(6): 84-92.
[ 7 ] 王迪. 国有企业人力资源管理创新发展趋势初探[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2005(4): 99-104.
Wang Di. Exploration on Development Trend of Creation of Human Resource Management in State-owned Enterprise[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2005(4): 99-104.
[ 8 ] 王庆, 赵慧. 基于粗集—层次分析法的薪酬要素权重的确定[J]. 统计与决策, 2009(3): 43-44.
Wang Qing, Zhao Hui. Determining Job Evaluation's Compensable Factors Weight Based on Rough Set-AHP[J]. Statistics and Decisions, 2009(3): 43-44.
[ 9 ] 张德. 人力资源开发与管理[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 1996.
Zhang De. Human Resource Development and Management[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press,1996.
[ 10 ] 朱晓妹, 等. 基于层次分析法的铁路运输岗位评价要素权重确定[J]. 铁道运输与经济, 2008(2): 48-51.
Zhu Xiaomei, et al. Determining Job Evaluation's Factors Weight Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Railway Transport and Economy, 2008(2): 48-51.
|
|
|
|
2010, Vol. 27 
