|
|
|
| Effect of Longitudinal Resistance of Line on Seismic Response of Bridge-track-catenary System |
| YAN Bin1, YU Limei1, LI Zhe2 |
1. Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China;
2. Zhengzhou Railway Construction Management Co. Ltd, Zhengzhou, Henan 450006, China |
|
|
|
Abstract Research purposes: To investigate the seismic response characteristics of the bridge-track-catenary system under different longitudinal resistances, a sophisticated simulation model was established, taking the example of a 7× 32 m double-track simply supported box girder installation. The influence of longitudinal resistance on the seismic response of each component in the system was explored, the response characteristics of different components under various seismic waves were analyzed, and the impact of the catenary structure on the track-bridge system was also revealed.
Research conclusions: (1) The longitudinal resistance significantly affected the stress on steel rails and the longitudinal deformation of fasteners. Moreover, the implementation of a ballastless track system notably reduced the deformation of fasteners at the piers while increasing the stress on rails at both ends of the bridge piers. Under the action of El-Centro seismic wave, the longitudinal deformation of fasteners under longitudinal resistance of ballastless rail fasteners is 16.7% and 15.0% lower than that under ballasted track and small resistance fasteners respectively. (2) The seismic response of the catenary structure and the bridge structure showed minor sensitivity to longitudinal resistance. (3) Under different longitudinal resistances, the impact of El-Centro wave on the bridge structure and track structure was greater than that of the Taft wave. Specifically, under the El-Centro seismic wave, the bridge stress was 9.6% higher for smaller fastenings and 7.4% higher for the ballast track compared to the ballastless track. (4) The presence of the catenary structure influenced the overall stiffness of the system. Considering the catenary, the bridge stress and the bottom shear force of the bridge piers significantly increased. It is recommended that during the design of high-speed railway bridges in seismic regions, the influence of the catenary structure should be taken into account. (5) The research results can provide reference for the seismic design of the track structure on the bridge.
|
|
Received: 07 August 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] |
Jiang Lizhong, Zhang Yuntai, Feng Yulin, etc. Simplified Calculation Modeling Method of Multi-span Bridges on High-speed Railways under Earthquake Condition[J]. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2020(5): 2303-2328.
|
| [2] |
Yan Bin, Liu Shi, Pu Hao, etc. Elastic-plastic Seismic Response of CRTS II Slab Ballastless Track System on High-speed Railway Bridges[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2017(6): 865-871.
|
| [3] |
严猛,魏贤奎,王平,等.大跨桥上无缝线路纵向地震响应研究[J].铁道学报,2014(5):96-102.Yan Meng, Wei Xiankui, Wang Ping, etc. Research on Longitudinal Seismic Responses of Continuous Welded Rails on Large-span Bridges[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2014(5):96-102.
|
| [4] |
张静,刘金增,刘志刚,等.高速铁路接触网腕臂系统的力学特性[J].西南交通大学学报,2021(2):347-353.Zhang Jing, Liu Jinzeng, Liu Zhigang, etc. Mechanical Characteristics of High-Speed Railway Catenary Cantilever System[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021(2):347-353.
|
| [5] |
陈立明. 高速受电弓作用下接触网整体吊弦动态力研究[J].中国铁道科学,2018(3):86-92.Chen Liming.Study on Dynamic Force of Integral Dropper of Catenary under Action of High-Speed Pantograph[J]. China Railway Science, 2018(3):86-92.
|
| [6] |
广钟岩, 高慧安. 铁路无缝线路[M]. 北京: 中国铁道出版社,2001.Guang Zhongyan, Gao Huian.Railway Seamless Line [M]. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House,2001.
|
| [7] |
TB 10015—2012,铁路无缝线路设计规范[S].TB 10015—2012,Code for Design of Railway Continuous Welded Rail[S].
|
| [8] |
GB 50111—2006,铁路工程抗震设计规范[S].GB 50111—2006,Code for Seismic Design of Railway Engineering[S].
|
|
|
|
2024, Vol. 41 
