Abstract：Research purposes: The comparison of cradle cantilever casting method and large segmental Support Cast － in － place method just concerned about the period and construction cost ，while ignoring the difference of structure stress ． The plane bar system model of the structure was formed by simulating cradle cantilever casting method and large segmental Support Cast － in － Place method． Analysis on the difference about mechanical characteristic of continuous beam provides references for practice．
Research conclusions:By comparing the results model analysis，the bending moment and shear of continuous beam are different in two construction method． Compared with the cradle cantilever casting method，using large segmental Support Cast － in － place method would reduce the negative moment ，increase positive moment of the beam and make the shear of mid － span increase，the shear of side span reduce．
滕炳杰. 挂篮悬浇与大节段支架现浇方案对比分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2012, 29(6): 55-58.
TENG Bing － jie. A Comparative Analysis of the Cradle Cantilever Casting and Large Segmental Support Cast － in － place Method. 铁道工程学报, 2012, 29(6): 55-58.
Bai Ping． Mechanical Analysis and Monitoring of Segmental Support Cast － in － place Prestressed Concrete Continuous Box Beam［D］． Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University． 2010．
Yuan Shuai． Discussion for Segmental Cast － in － situ Construction of Long － span Prestressed Concrete Continuous Beam ［J］． China Water Transport，2009 (5): 206 －208．
Dong Wende． Construction Techniques of Long Span Continuous Box girder Bridge with Variable Cross Section Cast － in － place by Bracket Method ［J］． Modern Transportation Technology，2006(3):46 － 49．
Hong Hongxing． Use of Technique of Moving Bailey Trusses to Cast Concrete in － situ in Sections in Bridge Construction ［J］． China Harbour Engineering，2000 (2):309 －312．
Qiu Zhiyu． Discussion on the Trestle Construction Program of Cast － in － place Girder for Passenger Dedicated Line［J］． Journal of Railway Engineering Society，2007(12):309 － 312．
2012, Vol. 29 
版权所有 © 2014 《铁道工程学报》编辑部