Research purposes: Aim at the existing problems such as fragmentation of evaluation object and fuzziness of evaluation purpose, this paper puts forward the idea of constructing the evaluation index system of green railway engineering with clear objectives and systematic objects on the basis of reviewing and combing the literature at home and abroad which focus on the evaluation of green railway engineering, and provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the research and establishment of the key development direction of green railway engineering. Research conclusions: (1) Green railway engineering evaluation had some research basis, but the evaluation criteria are not mature yet, and it is necessary to deepen the evaluation content in the aspects of carbon management, durability, railway characteristics, etc. (2) Based on the needs of industry development, the role of green railway engineering evaluation in product certification is clarified, and a consensus is constructed from the aspects of evaluation object and purpose. (3) Through the comparison of similar projects, the green characteristics, green challenges and green demand of railway engineering are condensed, and combined with the triple bottom line principle of sustainable development, this paper puts forward the exploration direction of evaluation indexes such as green engineering body, green construction process, green innovation benefit, green cultural quality, green demonstration contribution and so on. (4) The evaluation index framework of green railway engineering can not only be applied to the rapid construction of railway project objectives, but also become the research basis of green railway engineering evaluation standards.
TANG Juanjuan, WU Jun, WANG Mengjun, et al. , {{custom_author.name_en}}et al.
System Review and Index Exploration of Evaluation Research of Green Railway Engineering[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2021, 38(9): 74-80
[1] 周心怡. 世界主要绿色建筑评价标准解析及比较研究[D]. 北京:北京工业大学, 2017. Zhou Xinyi. The World's Leading Green Building Assessment Method’s Analysis and Comparison [D]. Beijing: Beijing University of Technology, 2017. [2] P.C. Bueno, J.M. Vassallo, K. Cheung. Sustainability Assessment of Transport Infrastructure Projects: A Review of Existing Tools and Methods[J]. Transport Reviews, 2015(5):622-649. [3] Chang A S, Chang H J, Tsai C Y, etc. Strategy of Indicator Incorporation for Roadway Sustainability Certification[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018(34):836-847. [4] Pöll C E, Willner W, Wrbka T. Challenging the Practice of Biodiversity Offsets: Ecological Restoration Success Evaluation of a Large-scale Railway Project[J]. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 2016(1):85-97. [5] Hsu K, Chao J, Chan H, etc. Estimating the Impact of the MRT Elevated Railway System on Carbon Reduction in Taichung, Taiwan[J]. IOP Conference Series. Earth and Environmental Science, 2019(1):12008. [6] Krezo S, Mirza O, Kaewunruen S, etc. Evaluation of CO2 Emissions from Railway Resurfacing Maintenance Activities[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,2018(8):458-465. [7] 曲云腾,王永泽.绿色铁路技术创新现状与发展策略研究[J].铁路节能环保与安全卫生,2021(3):30-33. Qu Yunteng, Wang Yongze. Research on the Status Quo and Development Strategy of Green Railway Technology Innovation [J]. Railway Energy Conservation, Environmental Protection and Safety and Health, 2021(3):30-33. [8] 欧宁.京张高铁清河站站房绿色设计研究[J].铁道勘察,2020(1):1-6. Ou Ning. Research on Green Building Design of Qinghe Station in Beijing-Zhangjiakou High-speed Railway [J]. Railway Investigation and Surveying,2020(1):1-6.
PDF(515 KB)
