黄土地区重载铁路路堤动力响应及长期沉降

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1419 KB) HTML (0 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 研究目的:现场实测是揭示列车运行荷载下铁路路基动力响应规律的重要手段。本文依托黄土地区某铁路专用线工程,通过现场测试获得重载列车运行情况下路堤内部动应力分布规律,研究动应力波形特征及演变趋势,结合室内试验数据预测路堤长期动力沉降。
研究结论:(1)列车运行荷载下路基土体的受力形式可以分为双峰型、正弦型和偏正弦型三种;室内动三轴试验加载模式可以分为“短暂间歇+突然过渡”和“连续加载+平缓过渡”两种;(2)多种工况下的峰值/轴重比处于特定的包络范围之内,包络区轮廓可以通过指数函数确定;(3)在本文研究背景下,50年运营期内列车运行引发的路堤动力沉降最大不超过45 mm;(4)本研究结论可以为移动列车荷载下铁路路堤服役状态研究提供借鉴和参考。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王瑞
	胡志平
	王雷
	白兰
	赵振荣

关键词 ：现场测试, 列车荷载, 动应力, 长期沉降, 波形特征

Abstract：Research purposes:Field test is a significance way describing the dynamic response of subgrade under moving train loading. In order to obtain the dynamic stress distribution in the embankment at loess region, the field test was carried out with a heavy haul train passing through, and the characteristics of the dynamic stress curve and its evolution rule were discussed. Additionally, the long-term settlement of embankment was predicted.
Research conclusions:(1) The waveform of dynamic stress could be classified into three types, i.e. bimodal type, sine type and deflected sine type. Moreover, the two loading patterns of dynamic triaxial test were also proposed, i.e. "short intermission + sudden transition" pattern and "continuous loading + gentle transition" pattern. (2) The ratio of peak dynamic stress versus axial weight under various working conditions is within a specific envelope range. Boundaries of the envelope range could be defined by exponential function. (3) During the 50 years of operation, the dynamic settlement of embankment could not exceed 45 mm in the present study. (4) The research results can provide reference for the service status study of railway embankment under moving train loading.

Key words： field test train loading dynamic stress long-term settlement waveform feature

收稿日期: 2020-12-15

PACS:

TU211.4

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(41877285,41941019);中铁西安勘察设计研究院有限责任公司科技开发项目(KJ2016-02);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(300102281102)

作者简介: **王瑞,1992年出生,男,讲师。

引用本文:

王瑞, 胡志平, 王雷, 白兰, 赵振荣. 黄土地区重载铁路路堤动力响应及长期沉降[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2022, 39(1): 7-12.
WANG Rui, HU Zhiping, WANG Lei, BAI Lan, ZHAO Zhenrong. Dynamic Response and Long-term Settlement of Heavy-haul Railway Embankment in Loess Area. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2022, 39(1): 7-12.

链接本文:

https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/ 或 https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/Y2022/V39/I1/7

[1]	肖世伟,雷长顺.重载铁路路基荷载特征和路基动力响应分析[J].铁道工程学报,2014(4):51-56.Xiao Shiwei, Lei Changshun. Loading Characteristics and Dynamic Response Analysis of Subgrade for Heavy Haul Railway[J].Journal of Railway Engineering Society,2014(4):51-56.
[2]	冷伍明,梅慧浩,聂如松,等.重载铁路路基足尺模型试验研究[J].振动与冲击,2018(4):1-6.Leng Wuming, Mei Huihao, Nie Rusong, etc. Full-Scale Model Test of Heavy Haul Railway Subgrade[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock,2018(4):1-6.
[3]	Sayeed M A, Shahin M A. Design of Ballasted Railway Track Foundations Using Numerical Modelling Part I: Development[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2018(3):369-396.
[4]	李鹏. 重载铁路路基动力响应与长期累积变形特性[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2018.Li Peng. Dynamic Response and Long-Term Accumulated Deformation Characteristics of Subgrade for Heavy Haul Railway[D]. Harbin:Harbin Institute of Technology,2018.
[5]	蒋红光. 高速铁路板式轨道结构-路基动力相互作用及累积沉降研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2014.Jiang Hongguang. Dynamic Interaction of Slab Track Structure-Subgrade System and Accumulative Settlement in High-Speed Railways[D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2014.
[6]	黄世光. 黄土地区重载铁路路堤-路堑过渡段动力响应及累积沉降控制研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2019.Huang Shiguang. Dynamic Response Research and Cumulative Settlement Control Analysis of Embankment-Cut Transition Section of Heavy Haul Railway in Loess Region[D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2019.
[7]	梅慧浩,冷伍明,刘文劼,等.持续动荷载作用下基床粗粒土填料累积塑性应变试验研究[J].铁道学报,2017(2):119-126.Mei Huihao, Leng Wuming, Liu Wenjie, etc. Experimental Study on Accumulated Plastic Strain of Coarse Grained Soil Filling in Subgrade Bed under Persistent Dynamic Loading[J].Journal of the China Railway Society,2017(2):119-126.
[8]	TB 10001—2016/J447—2016,铁路路基设计规范[S].TB 10001—2016/J447—2016,Code for Design of Railway Earth Structure[S].