对我国市域(郊)铁路的概念及若干问题思考

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (407 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 研究目的: 国外若干城市的市域铁路(通勤铁路)发展已经趋于成熟,我国市域(郊)铁路发展还处于探索期。近几年国内诸多学者对市域(郊)铁路均有着墨,但关于市域(郊)铁路的若干问题尚未形成较统一的认识。本文从市域(郊)铁路的国家政策及概念、建设模式、技术标准、资源共享、规划要求等方面进行分析,并提出了相关的意见。
研究结论: (1)名称并不重要,重要的是功能定位、服务水平和服务范围;(2)建设模式不能照抄国外经验,应灵活选用利旧或新建模式,甚至进行组合,并应做好铁路沿线一体化工作;(3)既可以选择铁路制式,也可以选择城市轨道制式,甚至可以采用组合制式,但应避免两极化,并尽可能采用地面敷设方式;(4)资源共享是必要的,但跨线运营的必要性和可能性值得商榷;(5)应优先选用直径线形态,因工程条件选用城市中心放射线也可接受,应先解决市域(郊)铁路的有无问题,再解决好坏问题。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李明

关键词 ：市域(郊)铁路, 政策, 概念, 问题

Abstract：Research purposes: The development of city railway (commuter railway) in some foreign cities has become mature, the development of urban (suburban) railway in China is still in the exploratory period. In recent years, many domestic scholars have paid more attention to city railway (suburban railway), and some problems about urban (suburban) railway in China have not yet formed a more unified understanding. This paper analyzes the national policies and concepts, construction mode, technical standards, resource sharing, planning requirements and other aspects, and puts forward relevant opinions.
Research conclusions: (1) The name is not important, but the function orientation, service level and service scope are important. (2) The construction mode should not copy the foreign experience, but should flexibly choose the mode of utilization of existing railways or reconstruction of railways, or even combine them, and should do a good job in the integration along the railway. (3) The railway system, urban rail transit system and even combination system can be selected, polarization should be avoided, and ground laying should be adopted as far as possible. (4) Resource sharing is necessary, but the necessity and possibility of cross line operation are questionable. (5) Diameter line should be preferred, urban central radiation is acceptable due to engineering conditions, and the problems of whether the urban (suburban) railway exists or not should be solved first, and then the promotion should be solved.

Key words： urban (suburban) railway policy concept problem

收稿日期: 2021-02-26

PACS:

U239.5

作者简介: ^**李明,1981年出生,男,高级工程师。

引用本文:

李明. 对我国市域(郊)铁路的概念及若干问题思考[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2022, 39(3): 107-111.
LI Ming. Thoughts on the Concept and Some Problems of Urban (Suburban) Railway in China. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2022, 39(3): 107-111.

链接本文:

https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/ 或 https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/Y2022/V39/I3/107

[1]	CJJ/T 114—2007,城市公共交通分类标准[S].CJJ/T 114—2007,Standard for Classification of Urban Public Transportation[S].
[2]	刘迁, 张杰. 城市轨道交通市域快线发展的实践与思考[J]. 城市交通, 2020(1):12-17.Liu Qian, Zhang Jie. Thoughts on Metropolitan Rapid Rail Transit Development[J]. Urban Transport of China, 2020(1):12-17.
[3]	李连成. 市域(郊)铁路概念辨析及其定位[J]. 综合运输, 2020(5):62-67.Li Liancheng. Discrimination and Orientation of the Concept of City and Suburban Railway[J]. China Transportation Review, 2020(5):62-67.
[4]	梁青槐, 柴树山. 市域快轨功能定位及规划要点[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2018(4):1-5.Liang Qinghuai, Chai Shushan. Functional Positioning and Planning Points of Regional Rapid Rail Transit[J]. Urban Rapid Rail Transit, 2018(4):1-5.
[5]	孙海富. 国内外市郊铁路的发展及建议[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2014(3):1-5.Sun Haifu. Development and Suggestion of Domestic and Overseas Suburban Railway[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2014(3):1-5.
[6]	李连成. 推进市域(郊)铁路有序发展的思考[J]. 中国铁路, 2017(7):9-12.Li Liancheng. Consideration on Orderly Development of Suburban Railway[J]. China Railway,2017(7):9-12.
[7]	张沛, 王超深. 中国大都市区市域快轨发展滞后的原因[J]. 城市问题, 2017(11):25-32.Zhang Pei, Wang Chaoshen. The Development Hysteretic Reasons of Regional Rapid Railway in Chinese Metropolitan Area[J]. Urban Problems,2017(11):25-32.
[8]	王悦欣. 对市域快速轨道交通建设的思考[J]. 城市交通, 2018(6):60-63.Wang Yuexin. Thoughts on the Development of Metropolitan Rapid Rail Transit[J]. Urban Transport of China,2018(6):60-63.
[9]	江永, 刘迁. 中国快速城镇化趋势下的市域轨道交通发展探讨[J]. 都市快轨交通, 2013(1):49-53.Jiang Yong, Liu Qian. On the Development of Regional Rail Transit during the Rapid Urbanization Process in China[J]. Urban Rapid Rail Transit, 2013(1):49-53.