秦望广场塔楼沉降后浇带提前封闭技术研究<sup>*</sup>

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (3)

全文: PDF (1354 KB) HTML (0 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 研究目的： 带超高层物业开发的大型地下综合体,为了不影响裙房和地下室提前投入使用,需要研究超高层建筑沉降后浇带提前封闭可行性,通过杭州富阳秦望广场通道工程实际项目,采用有限元整体建模分析,提出了残余沉降差计算方法,利用试桩静载试验P-S曲线确定了桩基线刚度参数,推导出沉降后浇带提前封闭楼层,通过实际监测数据,对理论计算结果进行对比验证。
研究结论： （1）试桩线刚度与单桩承载力特征值比值在76~119之间,与传统经验值100倍单桩承载力特征值相比,试桩结果离散性较大;（2）塔楼总沉降量与楼层数关系不大,与桩基线刚度取值关系较大;（3）塔楼桩基采用相同线刚度,楼层数与总沉降量成正比;（4）塔楼沉降呈线性发展趋势,理论计算与监测数据基本一致,因成桩工艺控制不稳定,导致工程桩线刚度有离散性,理论计算沉降速率与监测相比均偏小,导致后浇带提前封闭楼层判断有误差;（5）本研究成果可为超高层建筑提前封闭沉降后浇带设计提供参考。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	江胜学

关键词 ：沉降后浇带, 提前封闭, 残余沉降差, 超高层建筑, 桩筏基础, 沉降速率

Abstract：Research purposes: For the large underground complex with super-high-rise property development, the feasibility of pre-sealing the post-poured zone of super-high-rise building settlement was studied in order not to affect the pre-operation of the podium and basement. Based on the practical project of Qinwang Square passageway in Fuyang District, Hangzhou, the calculation method of residual settlement difference was proposed by means of finite element integral modeling analysis, the calculation results were compared and verified by the actual monitoring data.
Research conclusions: (1) The ratio of linear stiffness of test pile to the characteristic value of single pile bearing capacity is between 76 and 119. Compared with the characteristic value of single pile bearing capacity of 100 times of the traditional experience value, the test results are more discrete. (2) The total settlement of the tower has little relation to the number of floors, but has great relation to the stiffness of the pile foundation. (3) The pile foundation of the tower building adopts the same linear stiffness, and the number of floors is directly proportional to the total settlement. (4) The settlement of the tower building presents a linear development trend, and the theoretical calculation and monitoring data are basically consistent, because of the instability of the pile-forming process control, as a result, the stiffness of the pile line is discrete, and the settlement rate of the theoretical calculation is smaller than that of the monitoring.（5）The results of this study can provide reference for the design of pre-closing settlement post-pouring zone of super high-rise building.

Key words： post-pouring zone of settlement advance closure residual settlement difference skyscraper piled raft foundation settlement rate

收稿日期: 2024-04-16

PACS:

U455

作者简介: ^**江胜学,1981年出生,男,高级工程师。

引用本文:

江胜学. 秦望广场塔楼沉降后浇带提前封闭技术研究^*[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2024, 41(6): 85-92.
JIANG Shengxue. Study on Advance Sealing Technology of Post-poured Zone for Tower Building Settlement in Qinwang Square. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2024, 41(6): 85-92.

链接本文:

https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/ 或 https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/Y2024/V41/I6/85

[1]	于海宾. 高层建筑桩筏基础沉降后浇带浇筑时机研究[D].郑州:郑州大学,2015.Yu Haibin.Study on Pouring Time of Post-cast Zone for Pile-raft Foundation Settlement of High-rise Building[D] . Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2015.
[2]	朱春明,邱明兵,刘铁锐,等.沉降后浇带在共同作用分析中的模型和实例[J] .建筑结构,2011(S1):1235-1239.Zhu Chunming, Qiu Mingbing, Liu Tierui, etc. The Model and Example of the Joint Action Analysis of the Post-poured Settlement Band[J]. Building Structure, 2011(S1):1235-1239.
[3]	沈武兵. 高层建筑后浇带的留设与施工过程质量控制[J] .安徽建筑,2009(6):47-49.Shen Wubing.The Presetting and Quality Assurance of Embedded Joint in High-rise Building[J]. Anhui Architecture, 2009(6):47-49.
[4]	蔡忍行. 建筑工程中的后浇带运用[J] .江西化工,2010(3):143-144.Cai Renxing.Application of Post-cast Belt in Building Engineering[J] . Jiangxi Chemical Industry, 2010(3):143-144.
[5]	窦远明,沙秦南.考虑共同作用下主裙楼建筑后浇带力学性能和封闭时机研究[J] .建筑技术,2017(2):211-214.Dou Yuanming, Sha Qinnan.Study on Mechanical Property and Closing Time of Post-casting Belt of Main Building and Podium Building under Mutual Action[J] . Architecture Technology, 2017(2):211-214.
[6]	刘旭冉, 伊达,侯春明,等. 重庆来福士广场沉降后浇带提前封闭关键技术[J]. 施工技术,2019(12): 110-112.Liu Xuran, Yin Da, Hou Chunming,etc. Key Techniques of Advanced Closing for Post-subsidence Pouring Belt in Chongqing Raffles City[J]. Construction Technology, 2019(12): 110-112.
[7]	叶家强,迟铃泉. 基于ANSYS 分析的沉降后浇带封闭时间确定[J]. 建筑科学,2011(9): 20-23.Ye Jiaqiang, Chi Lingquan.The Determination of Settlement Post-Cast Band Closure Time Based on ANSYS Analysis[J]. Building Science, 2011(9): 20-23.
[8]	祝辉. 基础差异沉降对上部结构的影响[J]. 建筑结构,2016(6): 844-847.Zhu Hui.The Influence of Foundation Differential Settlement on Superstructure[J] . Building Structure, 2016(6): 844-847.
[9]	乌一东,胡菱,程旭凯. 主楼和裙房交界处的地下室底板受力分析[J]. 建筑结构,2016(12): 516-519.Wu Yidong, Hu Ling, Cheng Xukai.Stress Analysis of Basement Slab at the Junction between Main Building Bedplate and Skirt Building Bedplate[J] . Building Structure, 2016(12): 516-519.
[10]	张君蓉. 超长地下室板柱结构温度应力分析与抗裂技术研究[J]. 铁道建筑技术,2023(8): 25-28.Zhang Junrong.Study on Temperature Stress Analysis and Anti-Cracking Technology of Slab-Column System in Ultra-Long Basement[J]. Railway Construction Technology, 2023(8): 25-28.
[11]	刘俊龙. 桩底沉渣对超长大直径钻孔灌注桩承载力影响的试验研究[J]. 工程勘察,2000(3): 8-11.Liu Junlong.Experimental Study on the Influence of Bottom Sediment on the Bearing Capacity of Super-long and Large-diameter Bored Pile[J]. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2000(3):8-11.
[12]	GB 50007—2011,建筑地基基础设计规范[S].GB 50007—2011, Code for Design of Building Foundation[S] .
[13]	邸道怀. 采用沉降后浇带控制差异沉降的方法[J]. 建筑结构, 2008(4): 59-62.Di Daohuai.Delay Poured Settlement Strips Technique and Its Applications[J] .Building Structure, 2008(4): 59-62.
[14]	富秋实. 超高层建筑施工中沉降后浇带封闭时间研究[C]//第二十六届华东六省一市土木建筑工程技术交流会论文集, 2020(9): 646-649.Fu Qiushi.Study on Closing Time of Post-pouring Zone in Super High-rise Building Construction[C]//Proceedings of the Twenty-six TH East China Symposium on Civil Engineering, 2020(9): 646-649.