Abstract：Research purposes:Themathematicalmodels are offered forevaluation of the transportation equity in thispaper.
Research conclusions:The analyses of theoretical essence and representation format for the transportation equity are made from the aspects of different transportation modes, different social groups, different regions, and different generations. The various models are offered for the equity, including the equity model for differentmodes based on minimum of external costs, the equitymodel for different groups based onW ilson entropy assumption, the model forregional equitywith parametersofeconomical leveland price leve,l and the generationalequitymodel forconsidering the change of life quality and preference. These fourmodels from different aspects fully analyze the equity in details, and make itpossible tomodel the equity formathematical evaluation.
[ 3 ] Richard N. F.. The economics of congestion[ J]. Trans- portation Journa,l 1964(3): 28-34.
[ 4 ] YangH., HuangH. J.. Principle ofmarginal-cost pr-i cing: how does itwork in a general road network? [ J]. Transportation Research PartA, 1998(32): 45-54.
[ 5 ] Phang S. Y., Rex S. T.. From manual to electronic road congestion pricing: the Singapore experience and exper-i ment[J]. Transportation Research PartE, 1997(33): 97 -106.
[ 6 ] Phang S. Y., Rex S. T.. Road congestion pricing in Sin- gapore: 1975 to 2003 [ J]. Transpor
tation Journa,l 2004 (1): 16-25.
[ 7 ] LitmanT.. Social inclusion as a transportplanning issue in
Canada[R /OL]. Transport and SocialExclusion G7 Com-
parison Seminar, 2003[2004]. http: //www. vtp.i org.
[ 8 ] Stevens Joe B..集体选择经济学[M].杨晓维,等,译. 上海:上海人民出版社, 1999.
[12] Committee of road projects evaluation. Guide for road pro- jects evaluation part 2 integrated evaluations[R]. Tokyo: Integrated research center in Japan, 1999.
2009, Vol. 26 
版权所有 © 2014 《铁道工程学报》编辑部