山岭隧道大变形危险性评价的功效系数法研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (645 KB) HTML (0 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 研究目的: 山区铁路隧道地质条件复杂,构造作用强烈,软弱围岩大变形灾害频发,经常会引起支护结构变形、开裂甚至坍塌等,对其进行科学合理的危险性评价并采取针对性的防护措施具有十分重要的意义。本文通过综合分析大变形破坏特征及发生规律,构建完善的大变形评价指标体系。采用层次分析法和熵权法相结合综合确定各个指标的权重,基于功效系数法理论及计算规则,构建一种隧道大变形危险性评价模型,将其应用于成兰铁路杨家坪隧道大变形危险性评价。
研究结论: (1)大变形与围岩洞壁最大主应力、岩石抗压强度、围岩强度应力比、岩石弹性模量、围岩级别、地质构造、地下水密切相关,评价指标总体反映了大变形发生所需的地应力环境、围岩性质和岩性条件;(2)结合层次分析法和熵权法,通过引入距离函数,综合主观赋权和客观赋权建立组合赋权规则,解决了单一客观或主观权重的差异性和片面性问题,使得大变形评价指标权重的确定更加符合实际、更具科学性;(3)本文模型评价结果的准确率达到90.9%,验证了模型的可行性和准确性,可为预防隧道大变形灾害发生、降低施工损失及安全运营提供科学依据。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陈兴海
	周航
	张广泽
	赵晓彦
	陈明浩
	王彦东

关键词 ：山岭隧道, 大变形, 危险性评价, 功效系数法, 组合赋权

Abstract：Research purposes: Geological conditions of mountain railway tunnels are complex, the tectonic effect is extremely strong, and the rockburst is frequent, which often cause deformation, cracking and even collapse of the supporting structure, etc. It is of great significance to carry out scientific and reasonable risk assessment and take targeted protective measures. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the large deformation failure characteristics and occurrence law, a complete large deformation evaluation index system is constructed. The weight coefficients of each index were comprehensively determined with the combined analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and information entropy weight method (EWM). Based on the theory and calculation rules of the efficiency coefficient method, a large deformation risk assessment model in long tunnel engineering was proposed and applied to of Yangjiaping Tunnel.
Research conclusions: (1) Large deformation is closely related to the maximum principal stress of the surrounding rock cave wall, rock compressive strength, strength-to-stress ratio of surrounding rock, rock elastic modulus, surrounding rock grade, geological structure, and groundwater, and evaluation indexes generally reflect the in-situ stress environment, surrounding rock properties and lithological conditions required for large deformation to occur. (2) Combining the analytic hierarchy process and entropy method, by introducing a distance function, combining subjective weighting and objective weighting to establish a combined weighting rule, this paper solves the problem of the difference between a single objective or subjective weight, and makes the determination of the weight of the large deformation evaluation index more consistent practical and more scientific. (3) The accuracy rate of the evaluation result of the model reaches 90.9%, which verifies the feasibility and accuracy of the model, and it can provide a scientific basis for preventing the occurrence of large tunnel deformation disasters, reducing construction losses and safe operation.

Key words： mountain tunnel large deformation risk assessment efficiency coefficient method combination weight

收稿日期: 2022-03-18

PACS:

TU45

基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目(41672295);四川省科技厅科技计划项目(2019YFG0047);中铁二院科技研究开发计划课题(KYY2019003(19-22))

作者简介: **陈兴海,1976年出生,男,高级工程师。

引用本文:

陈兴海, 周航, 张广泽, 赵晓彦, 陈明浩, 王彦东. 山岭隧道大变形危险性评价的功效系数法研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2022, 39(8): 59-65.
CHEN Xinghai, ZHOU Hang, ZHANG Guangze, ZHAO Xiaoyan, CHEN Minghao, WANG Yandong. Efficiency Coefficient Method for Large Deformation Risk Assessment of Mountain Tunnel. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2022, 39(8): 59-65.

链接本文:

https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/ 或 https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/Y2022/V39/I8/59

[1]	张广泽,柴春阳,宋章,等. 软岩大变形发生的边界条件及对策探讨[J].铁道工程学报,2018(8):27-31.Zhang Guangze, Chai Chunyang, Song Zhang, etc. The Discussion of Boundary Condition for Large Deformation of Soft Rockmass and Its Control Countermeasures[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society,2018(8):27-31.
[2]	宋章,魏永幸,王朋,等.复杂艰险山区地质灾害特征及减灾选线研究[J].高速铁路技术,2020(5):8-12.Song Zhang, Wei Yongxing, Wang Peng, etc. Research on Geological Disaster Characteristics and Location for Disaster Reduction in Complex and Dangerous Mountainous Areas[J]. High Speed Railway Technology, 2020(5):8-12.
[3]	刘志春,朱永全,李文江,等. 挤压性围岩隧道大变形机理及分级标准研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008(5):690-697.Liu Zhichun, Zhu Yongquan, Li Wenjiang, etc. Mechanism and Classification Criterion for Large Deformation of Squeezing Ground Tunnels[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008(5):690-697.
[4]	李天斌,孟陆波,王兰生. 高地应力隧道稳定性及岩爆、大变形灾害防治[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2016:501-546.Li Tianbin, Meng Lubo, Wang Lansheng. High Stress Tunnel Stability and Large Deformation Disaster Prevention[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2016:501-546.
[5]	周航,陈仕阔,刘彤,等. 挤压性围岩大变形危险性评价的组合赋权-理想点模型[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版, 2021(10):3647-3658.Zhou Hang, Chen Shikuo, Liu Tong, etc. Combination Weight and Ideal Point Method Model for Risk Evaluation on Squeezing Large Deformation[J]. Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology, 2021(10):3647-3658.
[6]	Saaty T L. Applications of Analytical Hierarchies[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 1979(1):1-20.
[7]	Zhou Hang, Chen Shikuo, Li Hanrui, etc. Rockburst Prediction for Hard Rock and Deep-lying Long Tunnels Based on the Entropy Weight Ideal Point Method and Geostress Field Inversion: A Case Study of Sangzhuling Tunnel[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2021(5):3885-3902.
[8]	周航,陈仕阔,刘彤,等. 复杂山区深埋隧道软岩大变形机理研究——以杨家坪隧道为例[J]. 工程地质学报, 2022(3):852-862.Zhou Hang, Chen Shikuo, Liu Tong, etc. Large Deformation Mechanism of Soft Rock Surrounding Tunnel Deep Buried in Complex Mountainous: A Case Study of Yangjiaping Tunnel[J]. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2022(3):852-862.