地铁车站装配式出入口接缝抗震性能试验研究

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (11)

全文: PDF (1136 KB) HTML (0 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 研究目的: 装配式混凝土技术因其生产高效、便于连接、节能环保等优势逐渐广泛应用于地下结构,针对装配式构件连接抗震性能较差的特点,本文提出一种型钢插入式连接的装配式出入口结构,并探讨其接缝抗震性能。通过采用低周反复试验,得到型钢连接节点的承载能力、耗能能力、刚度、破坏形态等指标,并对型钢承插接口的抗震性能进行评价。
研究结论: (1)试验及分析结果表明,试件破坏形态均为侧墙整体受弯延性破坏;(2)与现浇试件相比,装配式试件峰值承载力、刚度、延性及耗能等指标与现浇试件基本接近;(3)在保证峰值承载力基本相当的前提下,型钢长度500 mm的试件具有较好的延性与耗能性能,且相对经济,建议作为装配式出入口接缝连接构造的优选方案。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	徐军林
	潘正义
	许俊超
	郭正兴
	方城
	朱张峰

关键词 ：装配式出入口, 低周反复试验, 装配式混凝土, 型钢插入式连接, 抗震性能

Abstract：Research purposes: Prefabricated concrete technology has been widely used in underground structures because of its advantages of high production efficiency, easy connection, energy conservation and environmental protection. In view of the poor seismic performance of prefabricated member connections, this paper proposes a fabricated access structure with section steel plug-in connections, and discusses its joint seismic performance. Through the low cycle repeated test, the bearing capacity, energy dissipation capacity, stiffness, failure mode and other indicators of the steel connection joints are obtained and the seismic performance of the steel socket joints is evaluated.
Research conclusions: (1) The test and analysis results show that the failure mode of the specimens is the flexural ductility failure of the side wall as a whole. (2) Compared with cast-in-place specimens, the peak load-bearing capacity, stiffness, ductility and energy consumption of fabricated specimens are basically similar to those of cast-in-place specimens. (3) On the premise that the peak bearing capacity is basically the same, the specimen with a length of 500 mm of section steel has good ductility and energy dissipation performance, and is relatively economical. It is recommended to be used as the preferred scheme for the connection structure of prefabricated access joints.

Key words： subway entrance of prefabricated concrete low-cycle repeated tests prefabricated concrete section steel plug-in connection seismic performance

收稿日期: 2022-03-18

PACS:

U455

作者简介: **徐军林,1973年出生,男,正高级工程师。

引用本文:

徐军林, 潘正义, 许俊超, 郭正兴, 方城, 朱张峰. 地铁车站装配式出入口接缝抗震性能试验研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2022, 39(8): 87-92.
XU Junlin, PAN Zhengyi, XU Junchao, GUO Zhengxing, FANG Cheng, ZHU Zhangfeng. Experimental Research on the Joint Seismic Performance of Prefabricated Entrance in the Subway Station. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2022, 39(8): 87-92.

链接本文:

https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/ 或 https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/Y2022/V39/I8/87

[1]	Yee A A. Structural and Economic Benefits of Precast/Prestressed Construction[J].PCI Journal,2001(4):14-19.
[2]	Yee A A. Social and Environmental Benefits of Precast Concrete Technology[J].PCI Journal,2001(3):14-19.
[3]	Fukayama K,Shinagawa K.Design-Construction of Circular Roof for Underground Reservoir Using Precast Concrete Beams[J].PCI Journal,1998(5):46-54.
[4]	杜修力,刘洪涛,路德春,等.装配整体式地铁车站侧墙底节点抗震性能研究[J].土木工程学报,2017(4):38-47.Du Xiuli, Liu Hongtao, Lu Dechun, etc.Study on Seismic Performance of Sidewall Joints in Assembled Monolithic Subway Station[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,2017(4):38-47.
[5]	Chen Z Y, Chen W, Zhang W. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Multi-Story Subway Structure Based on Pushover Analysis[J]. Advances in Soil Dynamics and Foundation Engineering, ASCE .2014,240:444-454.
[6]	Chen Z Y, Chen W, Li Y Y, etc. Shaking Table Test of a Multi-Story Subway Station under Pulse-Like Ground Motions[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2016,82:111-122.
[7]	陈之毅,刘文博,陈炜.多层地铁车站结构性能试验研究[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,2020(6):811-820.Chen Zhiyi,Liu Wenbo, Chen Wei. Performance Experiment of a Multistory Subway Station[J]. Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science,2020(6):811-820.
[8]	米鹏,谭平,张亚飞, 等.装配式容差剪力墙及其推复性能分析[J].土木工程学报,2021(5):46-55.Mi Peng, Tan Ping, Zhang Yafei, etc. Pushover Analysis of the Precast Tolerance Concrete Shear Wall[J].China Civil Engineering Journal,2021(5):46-55.
[9]	Park R. Evaluation of Ductility of Structures and Structural Assemblages form Laboratory Testing [J].Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering,1989(3):155-166.