施工方法对黄土隧道围岩结构相互作用的影响

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (814 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 研究目的: 因黄土自身特性,以致于黄土隧道施工时往往会出现围岩变形较大且支护结构受力情况复杂的现象,因而黄土隧道施工时一般采用分部开挖法。为了探明不同的分部开挖法对黄土隧道围岩结构相互作用的影响,现以某富水黄土隧道为工程背景,采用有限元软件Midas GTS分别对CRD法、CD法及三台阶七步开挖法进行数值模拟,分析比较三种施工方法下的围岩位移、应力及弹性反力系数k,并通过实测数据与既有理论对数值计算结果进行检验。
研究结论: (1)不同的施工方法对富水黄土隧道的围岩位移、应力以及弹性反力系数k值大小确有一定的影响;(2)通过实测数据与既有理论的检验,证明了数值模拟计算结果的合理性,因此,表2中的围岩弹性反力系数k的取值,可为今后类似工程设计、施工等提供参考;(3)本研究成果有助于理解富水黄土隧道围岩结构相互作用的特点,并可应用于富水黄土隧道计算分析相关领域。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	樊纯坛
	梁庆国
	房志群
	张堂杰
	曹小平

关键词 ：富水黄土隧道, CRD, 弹性反力系数, 相互作用, 数值模拟

Abstract：Research purposes: Because of the characteristics of loess itself, the phenomenon of large deformation of surrounding rock and complex stress of supporting structure often occurs in the construction of loess tunnel. Therefore, the partial excavation method is generally used in the construction of loess tunnels. In order to find out the influence of different partial excavation methods on the interaction of loess tunnel surrounding rock structure, a water-rich loess tunnel is taken as the engineering background. The finite element software Midas GTS is used to simulate the CRD method, CD method and three-stage seven-step excavation method respectively. The displacement, stress and elastic reaction coefficient k of surrounding rock of three construction methods are analyzed and compared, and the numerical calculation results are verified through measured data and existing theories.
Research conclusions: (1) Different construction methods have certain influence on the displacement, stress and elastic reaction coefficient k of surrounding rock of water-rich loess tunnel. (2) The rationality of the numerical simulation results is verified by the measured data and the existing theory, Therefore, the value of elastic reaction coefficient k of surrounding rock in Table 2, it can provide reference for the design and construction of similar projects in the future. (3) The research results are helpful to understand the characteristics of the surrounding rock structural interaction of water-rich loess tunnel, and it can be applied to the related fields of calculation and analysis of water-rich loess tunnel.

Key words： water-rich loess tunnel CRD elastic reaction coefficient interaction numerical simulation

收稿日期: 2021-11-30

PACS:

U25

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(51968041);兰州交通大学“百名青年优秀人才培养计划”

作者简介: ^**樊纯坛,1990年出生,男,讲师。

引用本文:

樊纯坛, 梁庆国, 房志群, 张堂杰, 曹小平. 施工方法对黄土隧道围岩结构相互作用的影响[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2022, 39(11): 81-87.
FAN Chuntan, LIANG Qingguo, FANG Zhiqun, ZHANG Tangjie, CAO Xiaoping. Influence of Construction Method on Interaction of Surrounding Rock Structure of Loess Tunnel. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2022, 39(11): 81-87.

链接本文:

https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/ 或 https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/Y2022/V39/I11/81

[1]	张学进.饱和软黄土隧道围岩注浆加固参数研究[J]. 铁道工程学报,2021(1):60-65.Zhang Xuejin. Research on the Grouting Reinforcement Parameters of Tunnel Surrounding Rock in Saturated Soft Loess[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society,2021(1):60-65.
[2]	刘勇,徐强,马凯蒙.深埋黄土隧道系统锚杆对弹性抗力的影响分析[J]. 铁道工程学报,2020(11):77-82.Liu Yong,Xu Qiang,Ma Kaimeng. Analysis of the Influence of Systematic Bolt on the Elastic Resistance of Deep-buried Loess Tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society,2020(11):77-82.
[3]	李波,吴立,邓宗伟,等.高速铁路隧道围岩抗力系数现场试验与理论研究[J]. 岩土力学,2015(2):532-540.Li Bo,Wu Li,Deng Zongwei,etc. Field Test and Theoretical Study of Rock Resistant Coefficient in High-speed Railway Tunnel[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2015(2):532-540.
[4]	余世为,刘成禹.基于地震波法测定岩体弹性抗力系数[J]. 现代隧道技术,2017(1):68-73.Yu Shiwei,Liu Chengyu. Rock Mass Elastic Resistance Coefficient Measurement Based on the Seismic Wave Method[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology,2017(1):68-73.
[5]	王志龙,周仁强,杨涅,等.基于Hoek-Brown准则的隧道围岩抗力系数计算方法及工程应用[J]. 现代隧道技术,2020(5):84-90.Wang Zhilong,Zhou Renqiang,Yang Nie,etc. Hoek-Brown Criterion Based Calculation Method of Rock Resistant Coefficient in Tunnelling and Its Engineering Application[J]. Modern Tunnelling Technology,2020(5):84-90.
[6]	张智涌,卓莉,肖明砾,等.隧洞围岩的等效弹性抗力系数及其影响因素研究[J]. 长江科学院院报,2017(9):86-90.Zhang Zhiyong,Zhuo Li,Xiao Mingshuo,etc. Equivalent Elastic Resistance Coefficient of Surrounding Rock in Tunnel and Its Influencing Factors[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute,2017(9):86-90.
[7]	王思洋,陈道政,李鹏.软弱围岩隧道两种开挖方法的对比分析及研究[J]. 天津理工大学学报,2020(5):16-19.Wang Siyang,Chen Daozheng,Li Peng. Modeling and Analysis of Two Excavation Methods for Weak Surrounding Rock Tunnels[J]. Journal of Tianjin University of Technology,2020(5):16-19.
[8]	樊纯坛,梁庆国,吴旭阳,等. 宝兰客专魏家嘴黄土隧道受力特性试验研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报,2015(5):1006-1014.Fan Chuntan,Liang Qingguo,Wu Xuyang,etc. Test Study on the Mechanical Characteristics of Weijiazui Loess Tunnel on Baoji-Lanzhou PDL[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering,2015(5):1006-1014.
[9]	胡志平,马甲宽,邓红涛,等.双连拱地铁隧道施工关键技术及力学行为模拟[J]. 铁道工程学报,2020(3):95-100.Hu Zhiping,Ma Jiakuan,Deng Hongtao,etc. Key Technology and Mechanical Behavior Simulation of a Double-arch Subway Tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society,2020(3):95-100.
[10]	李建旺,曹明星,周喻.高速公路隧道穿越富水空洞区协同施工法研究[J]. 地下空间与工程报,2020(S2):798-803.Li Jianwang,Cao Mingxing,Zhou Yu. Research on the Synergetic Construction Method of Expressway Tunnel Crossing Water-rich Cavity Area[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering,2020(S2):798-803.
[11]	钱令希.关于水工有压隧洞计算中的弹性抗力系数“k”[J]. 土木工程学报,1955(4):369-381.Qian Lingxi. On the Elastic Resistance Factor "k" in the Calculation of Hydraulic Tunnel under Pressure[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal,1955(4):369-381.