Operation Performance Verification of Continuous Box Beam in High Speed Railway
WANG Wei1, MENG Xin1, WANG Yigan1, ZHOU Zheng1, WANG Dongmeng2
1. China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, China; 2. China Railway 14th Bureau Group Corporation Limited, Jinan, Shandong 250101, China
Abstract:Research purposes: The verification technology of operation performance of continuous box beam with common span is sorted out, in order to provide technical guidance for better operation performance verification of continuous box beam with common span of high-speed railway. Based on the data of the dynamic performance test of high-speed railway bridges in China in recent years and the relevant theoretical research, the measured samples of bridge dynamic performance are statistically analyzed, and the recommended ordinary values of the operation performance evaluation parameters of prestressed concrete continuous box beams at the operating speeds of 250 km/h and 350 km/h are given. Research conclusions:(1) The tasks of operation performance verification of three types of continuous box beam with common span of high-speed railway are defined, and 10 main technical parameters for operation performance evaluation of continuous box beam are put forward. (2)The vertical natural frequency is determined by the power function of span, the vertical damping ratio is 0.5% to 2.0%, the ratio of deflection to span is 1/5 500 to 1/3 500 and 1/6 000 to 1/4 000 respectively, the vertical rotation angle at beam end is 0.60‰rad and 0.50‰rad respectively, the dynamic factor is 1.17 to 1.26 and 1.20 to 1.30 respectively, the vertical and lateral amplitude at midspan of beam is 0.25 to 0.80 mm and 0.10 to 0.15 mm respectively, the vertical vibration acceleration at midspan of beam is 0.25 to 0.40 m/s2, the lateral amplitude at pier top is chosen as the ratio of the height of pier and the lateral average width of the pier in the range of 0.5 to 4.2, the relative lateral displacement of rail support on both sides of adjacent beam end of ballastless track is 0.5 mm. (3) The research results are in line with the actual state of high-speed railway bridges, which can provide support for the revision of bridge operating performance verification specifications.
TB 10621—2014, 高速铁路设计规范[S].TB 10621—2014,Code for Design of High Speed Railway[S].
[2]
孟鑫,王巍,王一干, 等. 不同刚度的32m简支箱梁动力性能试验分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2019(9): 31-35.Meng Xin, Wang Wei, Wang Yigan, etc. Dynamic Performance Analysis of 32 m Simply Supported Box Girder with Different Stiffness [J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society,2019(9):31-35.
[3]
姚京川.高速铁路常用跨简支箱梁运营性能检定[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2017(2):34-41.Yao Jingchuan. Rating of Operation Performance for Simply Supported Box Beam with Common Span for High Speed Railway [J]. China Railway Science,2017(2):34-41.
[4]
孟鑫. 高速铁路常用跨度简支箱梁竖向共振条件分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2019(23):19-24.Meng Xin. Vertical Resonance Condition Analysis for Simply Supported Box Girder with Common Span Used in High Speed Railway [J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2019(23):19-24.
[5]
王巍. 高速铁路大跨度斜拉桥运营性能检定技术探讨[J]. 铁道学报, 2018(1):103-110.Wang Wei. Discussion on Rating Technology for Operation Performance of High-speed Railway Long Span Cable-stayed Bridge[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2018(1):103-110.
[6]
丁幼亮,王超,赵瀚玮,等. 基于加速度监测的大胜关大桥车-桥共振分析[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2016(9):48-54.Ding Youliang, Wang Chao, Zhao Hanwei,etc. Vehicle-bridge Resonance Analysis of Dashengguan Bridge Based on Vibration Acceleration Monitoring[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society,2016(9):48-54.