秦岭东段地应力场特性及区域性岩爆风险评估

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1029 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 研究目的:与典型的岩爆易发区为强烈挤压构造区不同,现今伸展构造为主的秦岭东段也具有高地应力、强岩爆特征。为保障铁路隧道等深地工程的建设和选线,本文对其地应力场特征、构造成因以及对岩爆的总体控制作用进行初步研究。
研究结论:(1)秦岭东段实测最大水平主应力S_H的挤压方向不受现今区域构造控制,而表现出与伸展构造方向一致的NW-SE,S_H平均变化梯度高达2.94 MPa/100 m,与青藏高原相当,综合来看,该区以燕山期挤压作用形成的构造地应力为主,属于残余应力,该特征指示岩体应变能可保留达上亿年,且大型岩体内部的应变能不易被伸展构造所改变;(2)区域上,秦岭东段S_H始终为三向主应力中的最大值,是岩爆风险的主控因子,在铁路选线阶段,秦岭东段需重点考虑花岗岩和闪长岩等硬质岩的岩爆风险,700 m以上易发生中等岩爆,1 400 m以上易发生强烈岩爆,建议尽量避免1 400 m以上埋深隧道;(3)本研究成果可推广应用于秦岭及类似山区铁路地质选线及隧道岩爆风险防控。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陈兴强
	刘瑾
	孟祥连
	张文忠
	黄勇
	王华江
	周福军
	李玉波
	李立民
	王凯
	邱士利

关键词 ：秦岭, 铁路隧道, 新构造, 地应力, 青藏高原

Abstract：Research purposes:Different from the typical rock burst prone area which is a strong compressive tectonic area, the eastern Qinling, which is dominated by the extensional structure in present, also has the characteristics of high in-situ stress and strong rock burst risk. In order to guarantee the construction and route selection of deep ground projects such as railway tunnels, this paper makes a preliminary study on the characteristics of the in-situ stress field, the tectonic causes and the overall control of rock burst.
Research conclusions:(1) The measured extrusion direction of the maximum horizontal principal stress S_H in the eastern Qinling is consistent with the direction of the current extensional structure in the area, both of which are NW-SE. This indicates that the in-situ stress is not controlled by current regional tectonics. The average variation gradient of S_H is as high as 2.94 MPa/100 m, which is equivalent to that of the Tibet Plateau. Therefore, the area is dominated by the tectonic stress formed by squeezing during Yanshanian, which belongs to the residual stress. This feature indicates that the strain energy of intact rock mass can be retained for hundreds of millions of years, and the strain energy in large rock mass is not easily changed by extensional structure. (2) Regionally, S_H in the eastern Qinling is always the maximum value of the three-way principal stress, which is the main control factor of rock burst risk. In the stage of railway route selection, the eastern Qinling needs to focus on the rock burst risk of hard rocks such as granite and diorite. Medium rock burst is easy to occur above 700 m, and strong rock burst is easy to occur above 1 400 m. It is recommended to avoid tunnels buried more than 1 400 m.(3)This research achievement can be popularized and applied to the geological route selection of Qinling and similar mountain railways and the prevention and control of tunnel rock burst risk.

Key words： Qinling railway tunnel neotectonics in-situ stress Tibet Plateau

收稿日期: 2022-12-20

PACS:	P642.13
	U212.22

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(42102266,42202240);陕西省科技厅科技计划项目(2023-YBSF-238,2021JLM-51)

作者简介: ** 陈兴强,1986年出生,男,高级工程师。

引用本文:

陈兴强, 刘瑾, 孟祥连, 张文忠, 黄勇, 王华江, 周福军, 李玉波, 李立民, 王凯, 邱士利. 秦岭东段地应力场特性及区域性岩爆风险评估[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2023, 40(2): 23-28.
CHEN Xingqiang, LIU Jin, MENG Xianglian, ZHANG Wenzhong, HUANG Yong, WANG Huajiang, ZHOU Fujun, LI Yubo, LI Limin, WANG Kai, QIU Shili. Research on the Characteristics of In-situ Stress Field and Rock Burst Risk in Eastern Qinling. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2023, 40(2): 23-28.

链接本文:

https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/ 或 https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/Y2023/V40/I2/23

[1]	孟庆任. 秦岭的由来[J].中国科学:地球科学,2017(4): 412-420.Meng Qingren. Origin of the Qinling Mountains[J]. Scientia Sinica Terrae, 2017(4):412-420.
[2]	冯夏庭,肖亚勋,丰光亮,等. 岩爆孕育过程研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2019(4): 649-673.Feng Xiating, Xiao Yaxun, Feng Guangliang, etc. Study on the Development Process of Rockbursts [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2019(4):649-673.
[3]	陈兴强. 基于地应力侧压系数的青藏高原东南缘区域性岩爆预测研究[J]. 铁道标准设计,2020(7): 44-49.Chen Xingqiang. Prediction of Regional Rock Burst in Southeastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau Based on In-situ Stress Lateral Pressure Coefficient [J]. Railway Standard Design,2020(7):44-49.
[4]	轩俊杰,严松宏. 基于应力场反演和弹性应变能积聚的岩爆预测[J]. 铁道工程学报,2021(11):79-85.Xuan Junjie,Yan Songhong. Rockburst Prediction Based on the Geo-stress Field Inversion and Elastic Strain Energy Accumulation Theory [J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2021(11):79-85.
[5]	杜卫长. 引汉济渭工程秦岭隧洞地应力测试研究[D]. 郑州:郑州大学,2017.Du Weichang. Research on In-situ Stress Measurement of Qinling Mountains Tunnel of the Han to the Wei River Project [D].Zhengzhou:Zhengzhou University, 2017.
[6]	韩金良,吴树仁,谭成轩,等. 东秦岭东江口花岗岩体水压致裂法与AE法地应力测量对比研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2007(1): 81-86.Han Jinliang, Wu Shuren, Tan Chengxuan, etc. Studies Onin-situ Stress by Comparing Result of AE Method with That of Hydraulic Fracturing Technique in Dongjiangkou Granite in East Qinling [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2007(1):81-86.
[7]	王思敬. 论岩石的地质本质性及其岩石力学演绎[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2009(3):433-450.Wang Sijing. Geological Nature of Rock and Its Deduction for Rock Mechanics [J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009(3): 433-450.
[8]	王朋. 引汉济渭秦岭深埋特长隧洞高地应力与岩爆关系研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2014.Wang Peng. Study on the Relationship Between Ground Stress and Rock Burst on the Deep-Buried Tunnel of Water Diversion Project from the Han River to the Wei River [D].Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University,2014.