|
|
COMPARISON AND SELECTION OF REINFORCEMENT SCHEME FOR 32 M-SPANS GIRDER TO MEET REQUIREMENT OF TRAIN SPEED-RAISE |
LU Wei1, LI Cheng-jun2 |
1Chinese Railway Engineering General Corporation; 2Railway Architecture Construction Research Institute of China Academy of Railway Sciences |
|
|
Abstract Research purposes: To avoid the existences of local fatigue damage of bridge structure and resonance vibration of train and bridge, to guarantee the integrated rigidity of bridge structure and its good working performance and to meet the requirement of comfortableness, it is necessary to reinforce the bridge.
Research methods: Several different reinforcement schemes for bridge are proposed according to the influencing factors on natural vibration frequency of structure and in combination with the real situation of bridge. The comparison and selection of schemes are made and rational scheme is decided after the modal analysis is carried out by finite-element method and construction feasibility is considered.
Research results: Bridge will vibrate with the effects of train dynamic load. The present dynamic design and evaluation are made to the bridges on existing railway lines based on the design speed per hour of train in construction time. After train speeds up, the shock excitation frequency of train changes, along with it the response of bridge structure also changes. After testing,it is found that the main problems of existing bridge are as follows: The univalent lateral natural vibration frequency is over low and the bridge lateral amplitude of vibration frequency is over low and the bridge lateral amplitude of vibration is over large.
Research conclusions: It is known from the calculation made by finite-element method that enlarging cross slab and adding support are good ways to increase lateral frequency, aiming at influencing factors on fixed frequency of bridge structure. Generally speaking, the integrated reinforcement result of Scheme 2 is best. However, it is feasible to complete such reinforcement to existing bridge by replacing concrete support with angle steel-concrete support, which can meet the same requirements. Therefore, it is recommended to adopt Scheme 5 for reinforcement.
|
Received: 01 September 2005
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
李国豪.桥梁结构稳定与振动[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,1996.
|
[3] |
铁道部丰台桥梁工厂.专桥2059概图[Z].1990.
|
[4] |
Roy R. Craig, Jr. 结构动力学 [M].常岭, 李振邦, 译.北京:人民交通出版社.1996.
|
[2] |
张俊平.桥梁检测[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2002.
|
[5] |
博弈创作室.ANSYS7.0基础教程与实例详解[M].北京:中国水利水电出版社.2004.
|
|
|
|