|
|
Research on the Long-term Deformation of CRTS Ⅲ Slab Ballastless Track-prestressed Concrete Simply Supported Girders |
ZHENG Zhihui1, LIU Lei2, LIU Peng3, YU Zhiwu3 |
1. NingboTech University, Ningbo,Zhejiang 315100, China; 2. YiLi Normal University, Yining,Xinjiang 835000, China; 3. Central South University, Changsha,Hunan 410075, China |
|
|
Abstract Research purposes: Taking the CRTS Ⅲ slab ballastless track-prestressed concrete simply supported girders (the girder-rail system) as the research object, the long-term deformation of the girder-rail system is studied under the action of concrete shrinkage and creep, the long-term stress characteristics of the base plate and the self-compacting concrete, as well as the vertical and longitudinal forces of fasteners are analysed. Research conclusions: (1) Compared with the single box girder (the uniform load converted from the ballastless track system is applied on), the creep camber of the box girder of the girder-rail system is increased. (2) The long-term deformation of the box girder leads to a camber of the ballastless track and causes vertical deformation differences between the rail and the slab track, and between the base plate and the self-compacting concrete, thus leading to voids between the base plate and the self-compacting concrete. (3) The longitudinal tensile stress of the base plate and the self-compacting concrete, and the vertical additional force of the fastener are small, but the longitudinal additional force of the fastener reaches the limit value within a certain range at the girder end. (4) The small resistance fastener can effectively weaken the girder-rail interaction and reduce the longitudinal stress of the ballastless track and the vertical additional force of the fastener caused by the long-term deformation of the box girder. (5) The research in this paper reveals the long-term deformation coordination mechanism of the girder-rail system, which can provide a theoretical basis for the maintenance of CRTS Ⅲ slab ballastless track structure during service.
|
Received: 12 October 2022
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
高亮, 马帅, 刘秀波. 基于高低的高速铁路简支梁徐变上拱识别方法[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2020(1): 25-30.Gao Liang, Ma Shuai, Liu Xiubo.Creep Camber Recognition Method of Simply Supported Girders in High-speed Railway Based on Longitudinal Level[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2020(1): 25-30.
|
[2] |
李欢. 考虑收缩徐变效应的CRTSⅢ型板式无砟轨道力学特性研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2022.Li Huan.Research on Mechanical Properties of CRTS Ⅲ Slab Track Considering Shrinkage and Creep Effect[D]. Changsha: Central South University, 2022.
|
[3] |
赵闻强. 高速铁路无砟轨道层间界面经时损伤演化机理研究[D]. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2021.Zhao Wenqiang.Research on Time-dependent Interface Damage Evolution Mechanism of Ballastless Track in High-speed Railway[D]. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University, 2021.
|
[4] |
李艳. CRTS Ⅲ型板式无砟轨道底座横向裂缝成因及影响规律研究[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2022(6): 21-26.Li Yan.Study on Causes and Influence Law of Transverse Cracks in CRTS Ⅲ Ballastless Track Base[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2022(6): 21-26.
|
[5] |
郑家辉, 薛志强, 陈进杰, 等. 施工早期CRTS Ⅲ型无砟轨道底座板凹槽角裂纹萌生原因分析[J]. 铁道勘察, 2020(5): 109-113.Zheng Jiahui, Xue Zhiqiang, Chen Jinjie, etc. Cause Analysis of Cracking Initiation in Groove Corner of Concrete Base of CRTS Ⅲ Ballastless Track at Early Construction Stage[J]. Railway Investigation and Surveying, 2020(5): 109-113.
|
[6] |
娄平, 黄港归. 路桥过渡段折角型沉降致CRTS Ⅲ型无砟轨道效应研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2023(4): 1292-1303.Lou Ping, Huang Ganggui.Study on the effect of CRTS Ⅲ Ballastless Track Caused by Angular Settlement in Transition Section Between Bridge and Subgrade[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2023(4): 1292-1303.
|
[7] |
张鹏飞, 桂昊, 雷晓燕. 多跨简支梁桥上Ⅲ型板式无砟轨道制动力传递规律研究[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2019(10): 14-19.Zhang Pengfei, Gui Hao, Lei Xiaoyan.Transfer Law of Braking Force for CRTS Ⅲ Ballastless Slab Track on Multi-span Simply Supported Beam Bridge[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2019(10): 14-19.
|
[8] |
郭立强. 预制后张法预应力混凝土简支箱梁徐变上拱的观测与控制[J]. 铁道技术监督, 2010(7): 23-26.Guo Liqiang.Observation and Control on Creep Camber of Precast Post-tensioned Prestressed Concrete Simply Supported Box Girder[J]. Railway Quality Control, 2010(7): 23-26.
|
|
|
|