JIANG Hui, LI Xin, CHEN Liangjiang, ZHOU Yongzheng, WANG Lan, LU Wenliang, SONG Guangsong
Journal of Railway Engineering Society. 2025, 42(9): 32-37.
Research purposes: The construction of railway bridges continues to extend into high-intensity seismic areas such as southeast Tibet, west Sichuan, and northwest Yunnan, where the combined seismic isolation system of "seismic isolation bearing + metal damper" is widely used. To find out the influence of earthquake characteristics and structural characteristics on the seismic performance of the combined isolation system, this paper takes railway prototype bridges and prototype piers as the engineering background,it establishes 22 bridge models with different pier heights and pier height differences, and explores the changes in pier stiffness and stiffness ratio of adjacent piers. The influence mechanism of site type change, and long-period and near-fault characteristics on structural seismic response is presented, and the applicable conditions and scope of the railway bridge combined seismic isolation system are proposed.
Research conclusions: (1) With the increase of pier height, the bending moment of pier bottom gradually increases, and the deformation of bearings gradually decreases; With the increase of height difference between adjacent piers, the bending moment of high pier increases gradually, and the deformation of low pier bearings increases gradually. Long-period, near-field earthquakes and weak fields will limit the adaptability of the combined isolation system. (2) For Class I to II sites, the combined seismic isolation system is applicable when the longitudinal stiffness of piers is not less than 396 kN/cm; For Class III and Class IV sites, the longitudinal stiffness of piers should respectively be greater than 634 kN/cm and 1 056 kN/cm. (3)In Class I and II sites, the combined seismic isolation system is applicable when the longitudinal stiffness ratio of adjacent piers is not less than 0.3; In Class III and Class IV sites, the longitudinal stiffness ratio of adjacent piers should be greater than 0.39 and 0.55, respectively. (4) For Class II sites, under the long-period and near-field earthquakes, the combined seismic reduction and isolation system is suitable for bridge structures with longitudinal stiffness of piers greater than 1 207 kN/cm. (5) The research ideas and conclusions of this paper have guiding significance for standardizing the seismic isolation design of railway bridges and for determining reasonable design parameters, and can provide support for the formulation of relevant technical standards.