FENG Huanhuan, HONG Kairong, WANG Shuying, MAO Hongmei, CHEN Qiao, NIE Hongbing, ZHENG Xiangcou, FENG Zhiyao, LIU Hui
Journal of Railway Engineering Society. 2026, 43(5): 56-66.
Research purposes: With the rapid development of urban underground space utilization and transportation network construction in China, the application of super-large diameter (≥14 m) earth pressure balance (EPB) shields is continuously expanding. Compared with small-diameter shields, the difficulty of face stability control for super-large diameter shields increases significantly, which has become one of the key technical bottlenecks restricting safe and efficient tunneling. This paper systematically reviews the current research status of face stability in super-large diameter EPB shield tunnels, summarizes the applicability and limitations of existing theoretical methods and technical approaches, analyzes the multi-factor coupling mechanisms and potential risk sources affecting stability, and evaluates the characteristics and shortcomings of current control measures. The study aims to provide theoretical reference and technical support for revealing the instability mechanisms of super-large diameter shield faces, optimizing construction control strategies, and promoting intelligent and refined development.
Research conclusions: (1) Regarding failure mechanism research, traditional theoretical methods such as limit analysis, limit equilibrium and silo theory have been established, along with numerical simulation techniques including finite element method, finite difference method and discrete element method. Model tests based on active unloading and dynamic excavation processes have also been conducted, revealing the fundamental laws of face instability. However, existing methods still have obvious limitations in characterizing soil heterogeneity, dynamic construction processes and multi-field coupling effects. (2) Regarding influencing factors, multiple factors including soil physical and mechanical parameters, structural characteristics, groundwater effects, construction parameters, as well as shield diameter and burial depth have coupled influences on face stability. Among them, the increase in shield diameter significantly alters stress transfer paths and support pressure distribution patterns, imposing higher requirements for stability control. (3) Regarding risk analysis, adverse geological conditions such as soft soil, sandy soil and composite strata, together with construction and management factors including unbalanced chamber pressure, mismatched advance speed and cutterhead rotation speed, groundwater activities, synchronous grouting defects and inadequate monitoring, are the main risk sources inducing face instability disasters. (4) Regarding control measures, stability control methods represented by intelligent chamber pressure regulation, soil conditioning technology and ground reinforcement technology have achieved remarkable results. Intelligent soil conditioning, coordinated coupling of excavation parameters and closed-loop control of intelligent monitoring are becoming important directions for future technological development. (5) The research results can provide theoretical support for face stability analysis and control of super-large diameter EPB shield tunnels, and offer technical references for the design, construction and risk management of related engineering projects.