多准则妥协解排序法在境外铁路选线方案应用

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (736 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 研究目的: 在境外铁路线路方案比选中,由于受土地私有化、征地拆迁困难、环保要求高等因素影响,同时政府部门及社会团体等利益相关方诉求各不相同等,均大大增加了线路方案比选和决策的困难。如何合理地选择线路方案,尽可能在满足各种限制因素条件下均衡各利益相关方诉求,使群体效益最大化成为境外铁路线路方案优选的一大难题。
研究结论: (1)针对境外项目特点,建立了包含技术效益、经济效益、环境效益、社会效益、项目可执行效益等多层面评价指标体系的多目标决策模型;(2)利用多准则妥协排序法进行求解,得出线路方案的比选排序;(3)通过案例分析对该方法进行验证,该方法具有原理简单、结果稳定、分辨率高等特点,在境外铁路线路比选研究方面有一定的应用前景。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	马彦祥

关键词 ：铁路线路走向, 多准则妥协排序法, 群体利益最大化, 个体遗憾最小化, 方案排序

Abstract：Research purposes: In comparison and selection of overseas railway alignment, due to the private ownership of land, difficulties in land acquisition and demolition, high environmental protection requirements and other constraints, meanwhile, different demands of stakeholders such as government departments and social organizations, the difficulties in comparison and selection of railway alignment are increased. How to choose the alignment reasonably, balance the demands of all stakeholders as far as possible, and maximize the group interests has become a big problem in overseas railway alignment selection.
Research conclusions: (1) According to the characteristics of overseas projects, a multi-objective decision-making model is established based on following evaluation aspects: technical benefit, economic benefit, environmental benefit, social benefit and project executable benefit. (2) The multi-criteria compromise ranking method is proposed to calculate the model, and priority and ranking of alignment options are obtained by the comparison. (3) The method is verified by a case study. This method has the characteristics of simple principle, stable results and high resolution, and has a certain application prospect in the research of overseas railway alignment selection.

Key words： railway alignment multi-criteria compromise ranking method maximization of group interests minimization of individual regret options ranking

收稿日期: 2022-01-21

PACS:	U212.3
	O185

作者简介: **马彦祥,1982年出生,男,高级工程师。

引用本文:

马彦祥. 多准则妥协解排序法在境外铁路选线方案应用[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2022, 39(4): 1-4.
MA Yanxiang. Application of Multi-criteria Compromise Ranking Method(VIKOR) in Overseas Railway Alignment Selection. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2022, 39(4): 1-4.

链接本文:

https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/ 或 https://tdgcxb.crec.cn/CN/Y2022/V39/I4/1

[1]	柯锐勇. 铁路线路设计考虑因素分析与发展探讨[J].工程建设与设计,2018(12):112－116.Ke Ruiyong. Analysis of the Factors Needing to Consider in the Railway Line Design and Its Development Discussion[J]. Construction & Design for Engineering,2018(12):112-116.
[2]	刘慧群. 高速铁路线路方案优选研究及实例分析[D].兰州: 兰州交通大学,2017.Liu Huiqun. Optimization Study and Cases Analysis of High-speed Railway[D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2017.
[3]	Opricovic S.Multi Criteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems[D].Belgrade: Faculty of Civil Engineering,1998.
[4]	徐冬梅,徐梦臣,王文川,等. VIKOR 法在城市供水方案优选中的应用[J].人民长江,2020(2):116-118.Xu Dongmei,Xu Mengchen,Wang Wenchuan,etc. Application of VIKOR Method in Urban Water Supply Scheme Optimization[J].Yangtze River,2020(2):116-118.
[5]	雷朝君. 新建铁路建设方案优选决策[D].兰州: 兰州交通大学,2013.Lei Chaojun. Preference Decision of Construction Scheme for New Railway[D].Lanzhou:Lanzhou Jiaotong University,2013.
[6]	李晴,陈鹏宇. 改进的VIKOR评价方法及其在学术期刊评价中的应用[J].科技资讯,2020(12):189-191.Li Qing,Chen Pengyu.Improved VIKOR Evaluation Method and Its Application in Academic Journal Evaluation[J].Science and Technology Information,2020(12):189-191.
[7]	赵辉,马胜彬,卜泽慧,等. 基于前景理论的VIKOR犹豫模糊多属性决策方法研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2020(4):124-136.Zhao Hui,Ma Shengbin, Bu Zehui,etc. Research on VIKOR Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-attribute Decision Making Method Based on Prospect Theory[J].Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2020(4):124-136.
[8]	孙涛. 铁路环保选线方法及评价体系研究[J].铁路技能环保与卫生安全,2020(1):12-16.Sun Tao.Research on Railway Environmental Protection Route Selection Method and Evaluation System[J].Railway Energy Saving & Environmental Protection & Occupational Safety and Health,2020(1):12-16.